May 22, 2012, 02:09:27 AM
News: Jangan lupa untuk activate akaun pengguna anda sebaik sahaja anda selesai melakukan pendaftaran. Anda perlu reply email yang dihantar.
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: tamron 10-24mm or canon 10-22mm? Please racun me!  (Read 793 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
shahgazer
Administrator
Pengembara Semesta
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1724


shahgazer
« pada: January 23, 2011, 09:14:38 PM »


one week to go for Mek Mas event.   shocked

Need to decide.   huh

Input appreciated. Don't mind racun-ing me. I'm all ears   grin
Logged

-Shah-
Owner & Founder of Falak Online
Personal twitter : twitter.com/shahgazer
Official Falak Online twitter: twitter.com/falakonline

*** if star moves NORTH, push the scope to EAST*** ... almost there!
redzuan
Pengembara Semesta
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 851


Email
« Reply #1 pada: January 23, 2011, 11:08:54 PM »

For a safe mind, go straight for Canon la. Lepas tu takde la cravings lagi untuk membeli. Beza pun RM600 jer. Pecahkan kos tu, jadi minimal per year/month (sepanjang tahun penggunaan). Takut nanti in the future rasa nak upgrade lagi. Macam teleskop juga.

Plus, you will never get 100% satisfied with 3rd party options. Dan, it is good for daily photography. Better colors during daylight. That will put it to even more use and make the "investment" so much more worthwhile.

Go on, kill that urge while u still have the chance.

Jika kita tak bercakap mengenai cravings, then comes image quality dan sharpness that is unmatched (most of the time) by again, 3rd party lenses, especially in this case. This might help.

Dan dari pengalaman peribadi saya menggunakan 3rd party lenses, saya end up guna kit lens yang render better and more real life colors, which I like, than a 3rd party equivalent or better. End up, it sits in my closest, doing nothing.  You might also want to think about its ability to lock focus fast. most 3rd parties are slow...

Jika anda bleh hidup dengan kekurangan yang disenaraikan ini (ni yg kronik sket la), maka 3rd party option is for you. Tapi jika anda rasakan perbezaan RM600 tu boleh tutup sebelah mata, maka teruskanlah dengan yang ORI.

Paling best, bawa laptop, kita test kat kedai. Tgk sendiri. Tp make sure dah standby duit.  grin

saya akhiri hujah saya dengan satu pepatah:
ALAH MEMBELI MENANG MEMAKAI
« Last Edit: January 25, 2011, 06:45:05 PM oleh redzuan » Logged

Astronomers believe that space is not a complete vacuum- there are three atoms per cubic meter...
haldafluke
Perantau Galaksi
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 130


infinitesubconscious@blogspot

master_halda
« Reply #2 pada: January 25, 2011, 04:49:33 PM »

Canon.

Enuff said.
Logged

The universe is like a safe to which there is a combination — but the combination is locked up in the safe.
redzuan
Pengembara Semesta
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 851


Email
« Reply #3 pada: January 25, 2011, 11:19:16 PM »

For your ease...

Tamron 11-18mm F4.5-5.6 ASPH LD IF lens for Canon. RM 1150 (nego)

Free Trade Zone  --> search "canon tokina"
Canon Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 still under warranty, date purchase 15-nov-2010 rm2000 nett conditon 9.98/10
New RM2350
Logged

Astronomers believe that space is not a complete vacuum- there are three atoms per cubic meter...
shahgazer
Administrator
Pengembara Semesta
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1724


shahgazer
« Reply #4 pada: January 25, 2011, 11:33:47 PM »

Tokina 11mm with f2.8, will give me shorter exposure time as compared to Canon 10mm f/3.5 ?

11mm versus 10mm, banyak beza ke?
Logged

-Shah-
Owner & Founder of Falak Online
Personal twitter : twitter.com/shahgazer
Official Falak Online twitter: twitter.com/falakonline

*** if star moves NORTH, push the scope to EAST*** ... almost there!
mymoon
Pengembara Semesta
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1265


Wish list comes true


Email
« Reply #5 pada: January 26, 2011, 02:00:38 AM »

Tokina 11mm with f2.8, will give me shorter exposure time as compared to Canon 10mm f/3.5 ?

11mm versus 10mm, banyak beza ke?

Doubling the f-number increases the necessary exposure time by a factor of four.

my mathematics is rusty here ..and I stand corrected embarassed
in this case 3.5/2.8  =1.25 increase exposure times by 2 to the power of 1.25 = 2.4 times.

for FoV differences see here

for lense comparison click here

sorry but horses for courses lah grin

[OT -My apologies to Shah]  I have a Nikon 12-24mm f4 and am trying to find an adapter to fit to Canon body. Any suggestions will be appreciated.


cheers

Logged

Astronomy is looking up!.......
Member of self funded astronomy group!
redzuan
Pengembara Semesta
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 851


Email
« Reply #6 pada: January 27, 2011, 09:38:46 AM »


[OT -My apologies to Shah]  I have a Nikon 12-24mm f4 and am trying to find an adapter to fit to Canon body. Any suggestions will be appreciated.


If can be used on a FF camera, please do bring it over to Mek Mas, and we can have a ride on a D3. grin

Dont think too much... Go get while item is still available! Kalo dah abes, nnt nangis...
Logged

Astronomers believe that space is not a complete vacuum- there are three atoms per cubic meter...
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.119 seconds with 20 queries.