Sungguh la best dedicated CCD+permanent observatory ni. Site tetap important? First few telescopes yang sebesar rumah dibuat oleh tauke tanah kaya ended up digunakan hanya beberapa hari dalam setahun sbb kerap berawan, mendung dan hujan. Tak ingat nama org ni.
Malaysia's style, for imaging.. grab whenever clear sky is available.
Setup 1
Advantage of permanent observatory when that occurs:
1. Switch ON
2. tekan ENTER
Clouds come by, close roof.. baca buku (untuk yang student la..

)
Setup 2
If 'mobile observatory' , advantage
1. Pack masuk kereta.
2. Main kejar-kejar dengan awan
<not stuck at one site>
when reach observation site.
1. Unpack
2. Setup mount, scope, cameras etc (1/2 hour)
3. Drift align )(&(#R^$#*&^#

( 1/2- 1 hour?)
4. If Drift align ok, then baru boleh start 'proper' imaging
5. Clouds come in, bungkus plastik

From my humble beginner's point of view of imaging
1. Setup 1 can start doing work average.. say within 5 minutes?
2. Setup 2 .. can spend almost 1 hour (min) for drift alignment. itu pun if the weather well-behaved. Then baru boleh start imaging
3. Issues with Setup 1. we are stuck with the local weather/llighting condition. (cannot sembunyi belakang chalet elak glare dari lampu jalan-stuff)
4. Setup 2, very flexible, can find best spot almost any square inch area.
From my observation during the Punggai event:
1. Keep imaging setup simple on remote site.
2. Setup to complicated, plus weather teasing around, can be very exhausting.
3. No issues for permanent observatory.. as fas as the well-being of the observer is concern.
Interesting topic. I will make this a new topic if agree.
BTW, I still never agree colourizing a BW picture if we don't capture using proper RGB filters on the objects. Stretching a LRGB photos to reveal 'better' detail... well that's another story..