Falak-Online Komuniti
November 22, 2008, 07:42:55 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Jangan lupa untuk activate akaun pengguna anda sebaik sahaja anda selesai melakukan pendaftaran. Anda perlu reply email yang dihantar.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CCD Imaging and Image Processing  (Read 5723 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Kayzack
Pendekar Bulan
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 49


View Profile Email
« Reply #30 on: January 24, 2008, 02:58:33 PM »

But....what Tommy?  I'm still learning how to imaging and processing, some images very worst and i'll improve it from time to time when ever the sky clear.  Please help me to improve it.
Logged
kamayok3
Guest
« Reply #31 on: January 24, 2008, 05:05:31 PM »

But....what Tommy?  I'm still learning how to imaging and processing, some images very worst and i'll improve it from time to time when ever the sky clear.  Please help me to improve it.

you got the best equipment to learn from already. Sometimes through MaximDL and all the software is not enough yet. Just you need more advanced techniques on photoshop or other softwares. Smiley

My 5 cents tips only.

Regards.

Tommy
Logged
Kayzack
Pendekar Bulan
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 49


View Profile Email
« Reply #32 on: January 24, 2008, 05:19:23 PM »

Thanks Tommy for your 5 cents tips.  Please take it to your account.

I'm mainly using Maxim for combining images and photoshop for final touch up already and i'll explore more and more on this two softwares. 

For now i'm learning how to get the best raw images....many factors involved...bad seeing, telescope tracking, guiding, focusing, etc.  I need somebody to discuss more on that, imaging and processing technic.  Maybe u are the right person to talk on that.
Logged
nsyahron
Kapten Sistem Solar
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 98



View Profile WWW
« Reply #33 on: January 24, 2008, 05:31:06 PM »

Bro Kayzack,
Very nice image of M42.  One that is expected from a professional observatory.
Logged

kamayok3
Guest
« Reply #34 on: January 24, 2008, 07:11:54 PM »

Thanks Tommy for your 5 cents tips.  Please take it to your account.

I'm mainly using Maxim for combining images and photoshop for final touch up already and i'll explore more and more on this two softwares. 

For now i'm learning how to get the best raw images....many factors involved...bad seeing, telescope tracking, guiding, focusing, etc.  I need somebody to discuss more on that, imaging and processing technic.  Maybe u are the right person to talk on that.


I will show you a photo of M42 same angle like yours, taken by one of my amateur astrophotographer friend in singapore. You can use his photo as a reference.

Will PM you the link of the photo. Then I will talk more about this astrophoto with you later. For an example, equipment he used....and so on.

Regards,

Tommy
« Last Edit: January 24, 2008, 07:14:10 PM by kamayok3 » Logged
aidad00
Pendekar Bulan
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 24


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 25, 2008, 12:40:38 AM »

hi bro,

Nice want I like the trapezium...... cool cool.
I think if you can do it with widerfield I think much more better.
Try to capture it with the Running man instead so you can see the
whole structure.. smiley smiley
Logged
Kayzack
Pendekar Bulan
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 49


View Profile Email
« Reply #36 on: January 25, 2008, 03:13:35 AM »

Check out uncompleted New M42 (with trapezium) using TMB152...taken last nigt.

http://observatory2.angkasa.gov.my/langkawibrowserastronomy/igallery/igallery.asp?d=\new+images\

Fail name: New_M42_TMB_uncompleted.png
Logged
universe24
Perantau Galaksi
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 171

16335200
View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 25, 2008, 11:39:15 AM »

Hi Kayzack,

Those are nice images. shocked

Have you do image calibration for all image? Are you take each channel only a single shot? Any stacking progress?
According to your exposure time, you press down some weak signal from the target a lot. Actually most of the image can be more detail, especially those nebula.

The M42 taken by both RC & TMB can be more stunning if each L:R:G:B taken in few minutes of a single shot.
Logged

To infinity, and beyond
Kayzack
Pendekar Bulan
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 49


View Profile Email
« Reply #38 on: January 28, 2008, 12:39:53 PM »

Please check out my new verision for M42 and Moon

http://observatory2.angkasa.gov.my/langkawibrowserastronomy/igallery/igallery.asp?d=\best+of\

Hi Tommy....i'm not far away from your singaporean friend.  Thanks for your reference.

Also thanks to mr universe24 for your tips.
Logged
universe24
Perantau Galaksi
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 171

16335200
View Profile
« Reply #39 on: January 28, 2008, 01:52:30 PM »

Good image!

I found there might got mistake on the photographic detail wrote on the Moon image...is that really take up to 10s for each color channel?
Logged

To infinity, and beyond
universe24
Perantau Galaksi
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 171

16335200
View Profile
« Reply #40 on: January 28, 2008, 01:55:51 PM »

By the way, the process of M42 is good....and I found a great Saturn image in the gallery. Interested to see all the original file of that Saturn image....could I?
Logged

To infinity, and beyond
Kayzack
Pendekar Bulan
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 49


View Profile Email
« Reply #41 on: January 28, 2008, 02:50:35 PM »

Mr Unvivserse...thanks for your comment, the real total exposure for Moon is 0.1sec for each channel.
Logged
Kayzack
Pendekar Bulan
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 49


View Profile Email
« Reply #42 on: January 28, 2008, 02:53:46 PM »

Of course u can see all of the raw images of saturn....please see me anytime.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC3 | SMF © 2001-2006, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 10.542 seconds with 20 queries.